2011-05-26 02:10:11| 人3,205| 回0 | 上一篇 | 下一篇

的以色列

推 1 收藏 0 0 站台

Obama 所提出以「1967年的界」做以阿方和的基，原本生活在旦河岸的巴勒斯坦人而言已是「砍到骨」的件了。坦胡在美的演，然用委婉，但是既否定了1967年的界，又提出不少要求：像是要在旦河沿岸，持占而的「屯」，以及巴勒斯坦人不得回到以前的故（因以色列是太家）。

在台或是都少有太人，很了解什洲有那多人太人。今年就有著名案例－－名人因反太的言成媒注目的焦。三月初被 Dior 除的首席 John Galliano, 以及上一周在坎城影展(Cannes Film Festival)被大列不受迎人物的丹演 Lars Von Trier 都是。「反太」的言在美然是大忌，竟一民族。美前小布希 (George W. Bush) 不他不喜的家，像什「流氓家」(Rogue States)，（不「流氓家」名小布希刻意漏以色列。）所以人於一家的意蔑看是符合美的行的。在是有太多的「太人」不是「以色列人」了，不然就「反以色列人」就好了嘛！在洲，大都是民族家，所以家和民族基本是等同的。像在中「反日本」不是一的表，更可以是民的基本度。就拿在中的例，中的一定要到日本喝倒采；如果生了像2004年洲杯足球，在北京比，日本又敢中的，日本球迷的人身安全就只能指望中政局是否意及派出安警力保了。

巴此次洲行，要友邦不要支持今年九月份合大中支持承巴勒斯坦提案(由阿拉伯盟主，而且土就是以1967年之前的以阿界)，就只及以色列的面子，但是坦胡的演根本就是打了巴一巴掌。之前在旦河西岸屯的新住宅也是。一向支持以色列的德，近年在外交政策上也不再像以往一昧的支持以色列了。

域民不以封疆之界，固不以山之，威天下不以兵革之利；得道者多助，失道者寡助；寡助之至，戚畔之；多助之至，天下之。以天下之所，攻戚之所畔：故君子有不，必矣。

Fatah (巴勒斯坦解放 Palestine Liberation Organization 中最大的派系，也可以因PLO被定恐怖，所以一招牌成立政府，正性高一些，也能取到阿拉伯世界以外的支持。) Hamas 都不是甚「君子」，不就是反抗侵略者的了，但或是「得道者」；以色列疑是「失道者」。在一片反迫的「茉莉花革命」浪潮下，以家形式迫一群人的的以色列，裁者何？持平而，「1967年的界」巴勒斯坦而言已是委屈了！坦胡："Israel’s 1967 borders were not defensible."　是他人土地的理由？希特勒利用生存空(Lebensraum)的概念自己的生存域有何不同呢？

令我的是－－台的媒什在立上偏向以色列呢？看看大新的，然是稿，但在新，所下的，都有此向。是因以前民裁代是用以色列做「生聚教」、「」、「以寡」的教育板吧！在民不但放「反共」，地中共修好，但年植入人心的扭曲世界有的修正。

以色列不但是流氓家，而且是有WMD核的流氓家。小布希 (George W. Bush)造伊拉克有WMD就侵略，把海珊抓死。但是以色列放到「流氓家」(Rogue States)之列都有，真是毫天理！

以阿端和平解是美人旁的使命，根可以是年杜下的，以後美遭受多的恐怖攻，以色列的建美助以色列有大的。台的境已很孤立了，也直在必要一那孤立的，但多家所的以色列作的典家。

To Friendly Crowd, Netanyahu Repeats Criteria for Peace

May 24, 2011
By HELENE COOPER and ETHAN BRONNER

WASHINGTON Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu of Israel, broadly laying out the Israeli response to President Obama’s peace proposals, called on the Palestinian Authority president, Mahmoud Abbas, on Tuesday to accept what Mr. Netanyahu framed as a tenet: that Palestinians will not get a right of return to Israel. In so doing, he proclaimed that this intractable issue was one of the stumbling blocks to a peace
deal.
intractable of a problem or a person 或人 very difficult to deal with 很付(或理)的

“I stood before my people and said that I will accept a Palestinian state; it’s time for President Abbas to stand up before his people and say, ‘I will accept a Jewish state,’ ” Mr. Netanyahu said to cheers from a hugely friendly crowd of Democratic and Republican lawmakers gathered in the House chamber of the Capitol.

“Those six words will change history,” Mr. Netanyahu said. “With those six words, the Israeli people will be prepared to make a far-reaching compromise. I will be prepared to make a far-reaching compromise.”

Of course, those words have bedeviled peace negotiators since 1979. Refugees in Jordan, Lebanon and across the Palestinian diaspora want a right of return to the homes they left, or were forced to leave, in Israel. But Israeli officials say a flood of refugees would mean more Arabs than Jews in Israel and could threaten Israel’s continued existence as a Jewish state.

Diaspora The movement of the Jewish people away from their own country
to live and work in other countries （太人的）大流散

Beyond that, as Mr. Netanyahu himself indicated a few minutes later, it would take more than the Palestinians’ acceptance of the Jewish state for Israel to sign a peace agreement. He also said that “Jerusalem will never again be divided,” and added that Israel’s 1967 borders were not defensible. He said new boundaries would need to incorporate large blocs of Jewish settlements in the West Bank and that any peace deal would have to include an Israeli Army presence along the Jordan River.

And, he said, Israel will not negotiate with the Palestinians until Mr. Abbas abandons the recently negotiated unity agreement between his Fatah party and Hamas, the militant Islamic group that controls Gaza and has refused to accept Israel’s right to exist.

Mr. Netanyahu was granted a grand platform before a joint meeting of Congress, and his speech had many of the trappings of a presidential State of the Union address. With elections coming up next year, the lawmakers appeared eager to demonstrate their support for Israel as part of an effort to secure backing from one of the country’s most powerful constituencies, American Jews.

trappings the possessions, clothes, etc. that are connected with a particular situation,
job or social position （某一境、或社地位有的）身外之物，，服

Mr. Netanyahu received so many standing ovations that at times it appeared that the lawmakers were listening to his speech standing up. “He managed to rally wall-to-wall support from Congress,” said Rob Malley, program director for the Middle East and North Africa at the International Crisis Group. But, he warned, it might have been a pyrrhic victory for the Israeli prime minister.

Pyrrhic victory 得不失的利；以重代取的利

“We’re not talking about a peace process anymore; we’re talking about a P.R. process,”he said. “None of this is going to help avert any of the dangers that the president mentioned in his Sunday speech, that Israel faces.”

Obama administration officials said only progress in the Israeli-Palestinian peace process will win European support for the American effort to stymie a United Nations endorsement of Palestinian statehood in September. And Mr. Obama has portrayed such progress as crucial during a time of democratic upheaval in the Arab world.

stymie to prevent sb from doing sth that they have planned or want to do; to prevent something from happening 阻；阻；阻止；妨

Mr. Netanyahu’s speech was the culmination of a tumultuous five days that began on Thursday, when President Obama called for the creation of a Palestinian state based on the 1967 borders, with mutually agreed land swaps. Mr. Netanyahu initially reacted furiously to Mr. Obama’s announcement, but in the past few days he has sought to emphasize their areas of agreement.

tumultuous
1. very loud; involving strong feelings, especially feelings of approval 嘈的；喧的；烈的；的
2. involving a lot of change and confusion and/or violence 的；的；狂暴的

Mr. Netanyahu also talked about the populist upheaval in the Arab world, casting Israel as a democratic island in a despotic corner of world. “In a region where women are stoned, gays are persecuted,” Mr. Netanyahu said, “Israel stands out.”

despotic 暴君的;暴虐的,的

His speech broke no new ground concerning the peace process, but it was not expected to. Israeli officials said that Mr. Netanyahu could hardly lay out new proposals to an American audience without telling his own people first.

Palestinian officials were dismissive of Mr. Netanyahu’s message, saying it included no new concessions along with the new demands.

“This is not going to lead to any solution,” Nabil Abu Rudeineh, a spokesman for Mr. Abbas, said by telephone. “Not only is he saying no Jerusalem and no return of refugees and keeping his soldiers along the Jordan, but he is demanding that we tear up our accord with Hamas. We will never accept an Israeli presence in the Palestinian state, especially along the Jordan River.”

The Palestinian leadership is due to meet on Wednesday to discuss the latest statements from Mr. Obama and Mr. Netanyahu. On Saturday, foreign ministers from some Arab League nations will meet with Mr. Abbas in Qatar to fashion an Arab response.

When Mr. Netanyahu’s invitation to speak to Congress was announced, it was reported in Israel that he might offer a new formula for a Palestinian state. But in the wake of the Fatah-Hamas accord and Mr. Obama’s endorsement of a solution based on the 1967 lines, that did not happen.

Still, Israeli settlers and their supporters condemned Mr. Netanyahu for giving away too much.

Naftali Bennet, a leader of the Yesha Council, an umbrella group for settlers, said that concessions made by Mr. Netanyahu over the past 10 days were unacceptable. They included, he said, the idea of maintaining only an Israeli military presence along the Jordan River, as opposed to annexing the Jordan Valley, and the mention to Congress that some settlements would inevitably be left out of Israel’s borders under any deal with the Palestinians.

Helene Cooper reported from Washington, and Ethan Bronner from Jerusalem. Isabel Kershner contributed reporting.

美中新政策以理痛批不切

「和平不能奠基在幻之上」

〔沛元／合盛二十一日外〕以色列理坦雅胡二十日罕地著媒的面，斥美巴，「和平不能奠基在幻之上」，誓言以色列不接受巴日昨提出、重以巴和，以色列退回一九六七年界之。坦雅胡番，明暴露他巴在中政策上的分歧，巴致力推的中和平更。

美以峰以理斥巴

人近小，待巴完白，坦雅胡就靠去，一九六七年前的疆界非和平之界，而是仍之界……「以色列不能重回些法（自我）防的界，我要在旦河河谷期」。

「史不再太人另一次」

管巴提出的重以巴和，前提包括以巴互土，但坦雅胡抓疆界不放，以色列然好中和平大方妥，不接受重回一九六七年的疆界。此外，坦雅胡述太史。坦雅胡，一以幻基的和平，撞上中巨石而粉碎，「我禁不起犯……因（巴）先生，史不再太人另一次。」

巴坦承人「看法不同」

巴坦承坦雅胡有「不同看法」，但他在「阿拉伯之春」民中看到良，有可能形塑一既能以色列自保不受害的，同又能解一折磨以巴人民十年的。

白言人卡尼在被到坦雅胡是否刻意曲解巴的言，看法「很有趣」。白官私下坦雅胡咄咄逼人、甚至斥巴的度大不；而以方深官，想中以一九六七年疆界基的巴提出「不合理的期待」，恐致中和平程倒退十年，「我不得不反。」

巴恐流失太裔票

二人在重回一九六七年疆界上的不同，恐延到「美以公共事委」，二人分在二十二日二十三日向力最大的以色列表演，恐陷於不得不站的尬境。巴在上次大得大多太裔的票，已有一些太裔民他的以色列政策感到不。

http://www.libertytimes.com.tw/2011/new/may/22/today-int2.htm

回1967年疆界？以理：巴在幻想

2011-05-22
中
【尹德瀚／合】

　以色列理坦雅胡廿日到白美巴行，巴提以色列巴勒斯坦界回到一九六七年之前，坦雅胡面拒，後在者中更出姿，斥巴的主是「幻想」。

　巴十九日在院演，首度呼巴勒斯坦人的要求，表示巴人一旦立建，未以、巴界以一九六七年中「六日」生前的；但他也提，未以、巴可以交土地，以解以色列人在西岸和迦走廊屯的。

　但以色列然法接受，坦雅胡在白者表示，以色列求和平意做出大方妥，但不可能回到一九六七年的疆界，因那些疆界是法防的。以色列的土只有九英里，太容易遭受攻。

　坦雅胡：「基於幻想的和平撞於中的岩石上。我有多少犯的空，先生，因史不再以色列另一次」。

　面坦雅胡的咄咄逼人，巴委婉表示，朋友之也有歧，再度保美非常注重以色列的安全。但白官私底下坦雅胡的度都很不。

　分析家，巴是第一位以、巴界做出如此明表的美。巴在院演之前，卿希拉蕊．柯林先打知坦雅胡，坦雅胡要求在演中界，但不被美方接受，致坦雅胡很生，方相火爆。

http://news.chinatimes.com/politics/11050201/112011052200123.html

The story was taken from The New York Times, Liberty Times & China Times (Taiwan), who do not endorse nor are involved with the production of this blog. The copyright remains with their original owners respectively.

示文章地

我要