<![CDATA[契約書-狀紙-存證信]]> 037482029 Sun, 01 Apr 2012 11:41:21 +0800 Copyright PChome Online. All Rights Reserved Mypaper Blog zh PChome新聞台Blog img/channel-ttimes.gif <![CDATA[變換車道(未依規定使用方向燈),違規地點、違規時間不符,不得連續舉發]]> 037482029/post/1381340565 037482029/post/1381340565 Thu, 16 Feb 2023 17:23:18 +0800 037482029/post/1381340565#reply <img src="//mypaper.pchome.com.tw/show/article/037482029/A1381340565"><BR>變換車道(未依規定使用方向燈),如其違規地點相距未達6公里、違規時間相隔未達6分鐘或未行駛經過一個路口,即不得連續舉發台灣臺北地方法院行政訴訟判決 110年度交字第149號原 告 洪0玲 ...<BR><a href="037482029/post/1381340565" target="_blank">...繼續閱讀</a> <![CDATA[因未辦理歸責而遭被告裁罰,自應推定有過失,既未能舉證證明其無過失,則依法裁罰]]> 037482029/post/1377467159 037482029/post/1377467159 Wed, 20 Feb 2019 14:24:21 +0800 037482029/post/1377467159#reply <img src="//mypaper.pchome.com.tw/show/article/037482029/A1377467159"><BR>因未辦理歸責而遭被告裁罰,自應推定有過失,既未能舉證證明其無過失,則依法裁罰【裁判字號】105,交,28【裁判日期】1050801【裁判案由】交通裁決【裁判全文】臺灣臺北地方法院行...<BR><a href="037482029/post/1377467159" target="_blank">...繼續閱讀</a> <![CDATA[採證程序有如上所述之瑕疵(未提供漱口),據此所得之數值尚難逕予採認]]> 037482029/post/1377467109 037482029/post/1377467109 Wed, 20 Feb 2019 14:20:12 +0800 037482029/post/1377467109#reply <img src="//mypaper.pchome.com.tw/show/article/037482029/A1377467109"><BR>採證程序有如上所述之瑕疵(未提供漱口),據此所得之數值尚難逕予採認【裁判字號】105,交,136【裁判日期】1051228【裁判案由】交通裁決【裁判全文】臺灣臺北地方法院行政訴訟判...<BR><a href="037482029/post/1377467109" target="_blank">...繼續閱讀</a> <![CDATA[未曾提出其他有力之佐證以證明原告有拒絕接受稽查而逃逸之違規事實,待證事實陷入真偽不明且確實存有合理可疑,原處分撤銷]]> 037482029/post/1377416665 037482029/post/1377416665 Sun, 17 Feb 2019 16:48:07 +0800 037482029/post/1377416665#reply <img src="//mypaper.pchome.com.tw/show/article/037482029/A1377416665"><BR>未曾提出其他有力之佐證以證明原告有拒絕接受稽查而逃逸之違規事實,待證事實陷入真偽不明且確實存有合理可疑,對原告作成原處分之裁罰撤銷【裁判字號】106,交,85【裁判日期】1061030【裁...<BR><a href="037482029/post/1377416665" target="_blank">...繼續閱讀</a> <![CDATA[舉發員警站立位置無法明確查看有違規闖紅燈情事,撤銷原處分]]> 037482029/post/1377416557 037482029/post/1377416557 Sun, 17 Feb 2019 16:41:34 +0800 037482029/post/1377416557#reply <img src="//mypaper.pchome.com.tw/show/article/037482029/A1377416557"><BR>舉發員警站立位置無法明確查看有違規闖紅燈情事,撤銷原處分【裁判字號】106,交,483【裁判日期】1061228【裁判案由】交通裁決【裁判全文】臺灣新北地方法院行政訴訟判決    ...<BR><a href="037482029/post/1377416557" target="_blank">...繼續閱讀</a> <![CDATA[程序瑕疵,不符『告知始有處罰』之原則]]> 037482029/post/1377416487 037482029/post/1377416487 Sun, 17 Feb 2019 16:37:54 +0800 037482029/post/1377416487#reply <img src="//mypaper.pchome.com.tw/show/article/037482029/A1377416487"><BR>程序瑕疵,不符『告知始有處罰』之原則【裁判字號】106,交,8【裁判日期】1061030【裁判案由】交通裁決【裁判全文】臺灣臺北地方法院行政訴訟判決      106年度交字第8號...<BR><a href="037482029/post/1377416487" target="_blank">...繼續閱讀</a> <![CDATA[舉發員警就前揭「前常有測速照相」之警示牌標誌設置,既有不符應於測速地點前100 公尺至300公尺間標示之法定要求]]> 037482029/post/1377416375 037482029/post/1377416375 Sun, 17 Feb 2019 16:32:39 +0800 037482029/post/1377416375#reply <img src="//mypaper.pchome.com.tw/show/article/037482029/A1377416375"><BR>舉發員警就前揭「前常有測速照相」之警示牌標誌設置,既有不符應於測速地點前100 公尺至300公尺間標示之法定要求【裁判字號】106,交,12【裁判日期】1061110【裁判案由】交通裁決...<BR><a href="037482029/post/1377416375" target="_blank">...繼續閱讀</a> <![CDATA[路口待轉區之標線未與兩段式左轉標誌配合設置,未符合道路交通標誌標線號誌設置規則之規定]]> 037482029/post/1377416262 037482029/post/1377416262 Sun, 17 Feb 2019 16:27:01 +0800 037482029/post/1377416262#reply <img src="//mypaper.pchome.com.tw/show/article/037482029/A1377416262"><BR>路口待轉區之標線未與兩段式左轉標誌配合設置,未符合道路交通標誌標線號誌設置規則之規定【裁判字號】106,交,48【裁判日期】1061031【裁判案由】交通裁決【裁判全文】臺灣嘉義地...<BR><a href="037482029/post/1377416262" target="_blank">...繼續閱讀</a> <![CDATA[舉發警員未對系爭汽車駕駛人有告知要實施酒測程序之經過事實,自難逕認原告具有拒不配合警員實施酒測程序之情事]]> 037482029/post/1377416191 037482029/post/1377416191 Sun, 17 Feb 2019 16:23:19 +0800 037482029/post/1377416191#reply <img src="//mypaper.pchome.com.tw/show/article/037482029/A1377416191"><BR>舉發警員未對系爭汽車駕駛人有告知要實施酒測程序之經過事實,自難逕認原告具有拒不配合警員實施酒測程序之情事【裁判字號】106,交,651【裁判日期】1061227【裁判案由】交通裁決【裁...<BR><a href="037482029/post/1377416191" target="_blank">...繼續閱讀</a> <![CDATA[舉發員警係以違法方式進行酒測,原告自得予以拒絕]]> 037482029/post/1377354967 037482029/post/1377354967 Thu, 14 Feb 2019 16:40:56 +0800 037482029/post/1377354967#reply <img src="//mypaper.pchome.com.tw/show/article/037482029/A1377354967"><BR>舉發員警係以違法方式進行酒測,原告自得予以拒絕【裁判字號】106,交,1【裁判日期】1061023【裁判案由】交通裁決【裁判全文】臺灣臺北地方法院行政訴訟判決      106年度...<BR><a href="037482029/post/1377354967" target="_blank">...繼續閱讀</a> <![CDATA[員警之攔查違反警察職權行使法第8 條規定,其要求原告接受酒測檢定,原屬欠缺職權行使依據,其舉發已難認適法]]> 037482029/post/1377354902 037482029/post/1377354902 Thu, 14 Feb 2019 16:36:09 +0800 037482029/post/1377354902#reply <img src="//mypaper.pchome.com.tw/show/article/037482029/A1377354902"><BR>員警之攔查違反警察職權行使法第8 條規定,其要求原告接受酒測檢定,原屬欠缺職權行使依據,其舉發已難認適法【裁判字號】106,交,106【裁判日期】1061019【裁判案由】交通裁決【裁...<BR><a href="037482029/post/1377354902" target="_blank">...繼續閱讀</a> <![CDATA[測速器是否確經檢定合格,容有疑問。又舉發地點前 300公尺處所設「前有違規取締」是否有設置,有疑慮]]> 037482029/post/1377354841 037482029/post/1377354841 Thu, 14 Feb 2019 16:31:16 +0800 037482029/post/1377354841#reply <img src="//mypaper.pchome.com.tw/show/article/037482029/A1377354841"><BR>經警測得超速之測速器是否確經檢定合格,容有疑問。又舉發地點前 300公尺處所設「前有違規取締」之標示牌,無從得悉確有該標示牌之設置【裁判字號】106,交,9【裁判日期】1061026【裁判...<BR><a href="037482029/post/1377354841" target="_blank">...繼續閱讀</a> <![CDATA[員警臨檢盤查違反警察職權行使法第8條之規定,其要求被上訴人接受酒測檢定並非合法,被上訴人拒絕酒測,並未違反行政法上義務]]> 037482029/post/1377354750 037482029/post/1377354750 Thu, 14 Feb 2019 16:24:49 +0800 037482029/post/1377354750#reply <img src="//mypaper.pchome.com.tw/show/article/037482029/A1377354750"><BR>員警臨檢盤查違反警察職權行使法第8條之規定,其要求被上訴人接受酒測檢定並非合法,被上訴人拒絕酒測,並未違反行政法上義務【裁判字號】106,交上,247【裁判日期】1061108【裁判案由】...<BR><a href="037482029/post/1377354750" target="_blank">...繼續閱讀</a> <![CDATA[開遠光燈非屬「隧道內未開亮頭燈」之違規事實,違規事實之認定實有矛盾之處]]> 037482029/post/1377354693 037482029/post/1377354693 Thu, 14 Feb 2019 16:19:49 +0800 037482029/post/1377354693#reply <img src="//mypaper.pchome.com.tw/show/article/037482029/A1377354693"><BR>開遠光燈非屬「隧道內未開亮頭燈」之違規事實,違規事實之認定實有矛盾之處【裁判字號】106,交,230【裁判日期】1060623【裁判案由】交通裁決【裁判全文】臺灣新北地方法院行政訴...<BR><a href="037482029/post/1377354693" target="_blank">...繼續閱讀</a> <![CDATA[類似於飆車族聚集或在道路上蛇行、炫技等構成重大危害交通安全之故意行為,且其他處罰條文無法適當評價時,始能適用該條處罰]]> 037482029/post/1377354628 037482029/post/1377354628 Thu, 14 Feb 2019 16:14:56 +0800 037482029/post/1377354628#reply <img src="//mypaper.pchome.com.tw/show/article/037482029/A1377354628"><BR>類似於飆車族聚集或在道路上蛇行、炫技等構成重大危害交通安全之故意行為,且其他處罰條文無法適當評價時,始能適用該條處罰【裁判字號】106,交,240【裁判日期】1061227【裁判案由】交通...<BR><a href="037482029/post/1377354628" target="_blank">...繼續閱讀</a> ubao msn snddm index pchome yahoo rakuten mypaper meadowduck bidyahoo youbao zxmzxm asda bnvcg cvbfg dfscv mmhjk xxddc yybgb zznbn ccubao uaitu acv GXCV ET GDG YH FG BCVB FJFH CBRE CBC GDG ET54 WRWR RWER WREW WRWER RWER SDG EW SF DSFSF fbbs ubao fhd dfg ewr dg df ewwr ewwr et ruyut utut dfg fgd gdfgt etg dfgt dfgd ert4 gd fgg wr 235 wer3 we vsdf sdf gdf ert xcv sdf rwer hfd dfg cvb rwf afb dfh jgh bmn lgh rty gfds cxv xcv xcs vdas fdf fgd cv sdf tert sdf sdf sdf sdf sdf sdf sdf sdf sdf sdf sdf sdf sdf sdf sdf sdf sdf sdf sdf sdf sdf sdf sdf sdf sdf sdf sdf sdf sdf sdf sdf sdf sdf sdf sdf sdf sdf sdf sdf sdf shasha9178 shasha9178 shasha9178 shasha9178 shasha9178 liflif2 liflif2 liflif2 liflif2 liflif2 liblib3 liblib3 liblib3 liblib3 liblib3 zhazha444 zhazha444 zhazha444 zhazha444 zhazha444 dende5 dende denden denden2 denden21 fenfen9 fenf619 fen619 fenfe9 fe619 sdf sdf sdf sdf sdf zhazh90 zhazh0 zhaa50 zha90 zh590 zho zhoz zhozh zhozho zhozho2 lislis lls95 lili95 lils5 liss9 sdf0ty987 sdft876 sdft9876 sdf09876 sd0t9876 sdf0ty98 sdf0976 sdf0ty986 sdf0ty96 sdf0t76 sdf0876 df0ty98 sf0t876 sd0ty76 sdy76 sdf76 sdf0t76 sdf0ty9 sdf0ty98 sdf0ty987 sdf0ty98 sdf6676 sdf876 sd876 sd876 sdf6 sdf6 sdf9876 sdf0t sdf06 sdf0ty9776 sdf0ty9776 sdf0ty76 sdf8876 sdf0t sd6 sdf06 s688876 sd688 sdf86