[请教] android::hardware::Return 无法使用拷贝构造函数，怎么办？

V2EX = way to explore

V2EX 是一个关于分享和探索的地方

已注册用户请登录

请不要在回答技术问题时复制粘贴 AI 生成的内容

这是一个创建于 2257 天前的主题，其中的信息可能已经有所发展或是发生改变。

在编写 c++的单体测试，但是在用 mock 的时候出了点问题。

//在 mock 类里面，函数已经被 mock 了 MOCK_METHOD1(unRegisterListener, Return<EnCommonFuncResult>(EnCommonListenerID)); //unRegisterListener 的函数签名是 virtual Return<EnMeterFuncResult> unRegisterListener(EnMeterListenerID serviceId)//这个 Return 是 android::hardware::Return //现在想进行插桩，EnCommonFuncResult 就是一个 enum class EnCommonFuncResult : uint8_t Return<EnCommonFuncResult> returnOk= EnCommonFuncResult::EN_COMMON_RESULT_OK;//这个 Return 是 android::hardware::Return EXPECT_CALL(mockICommon, unRegisterListener(_)).WillOnce(::testing::Return(returnOk));//这儿出错 //以下为报错信息 error: call to implicitly-deleted copy constructor of 'android::hardware::Return<iauto::hardware::ucom::common::V1_0::EnCommonFuncResult>' system/libhidl/base/include/hidl/Status.h:200:5: note: copy constructor is implicitly deleted because 'Return<iauto::hardware::ucom::common::V1_0::EnCommonFuncResult>' has a user-declared move constructor Return(Return &&other) = default;

抱歉 c++有点菜，实在没搞懂这个 android::hardware::Return 该怎么用

第 1 条附言 2019-10-24 21:20:15 +08:00

```
改成用这个，也报错：
EXPECT_CALL(mockICommon, unRegisterListener(_)).WillOnce(::testing::Return(EnCommonFuncResult::EN_COMMON_RESULT_OK));

以下是报错信息：
error: call to implicitly-deleted copy constructor of 'testing::internal::ReturnAction<iauto::hardware::ucom::common::V1_0::EnCommonFuncResult>::Impl<iauto::hardware::ucom::common::V1_0::EnCommonFuncResult, android::hardware::Return<iauto::hardware::ucom::common::V1_0::EnCommonFuncResult> (iauto::hardware::ucom::common::V1_0::EnCommonListenerID)>::Result' (aka 'android::hardware::Return<iauto::hardware::ucom::common::V1_0::EnCommonFuncResult>')
virtual Result Perform(const ArgumentTuple&) { return value_; }
^~~~~~
external/googletest/googlemock/include/gmock/gmock-actions.h:575:14: note: in instantiation of member function 'testing::internal::ReturnAction<iauto::hardware::ucom::common::V1_0::EnCommonFuncResult>::Impl<iauto::hardware::ucom::common::V1_0::EnCommonFuncResult, android::hardware::Return<iauto::hardware::ucom::common::V1_0::EnCommonFuncResult> (iauto::hardware::ucom::common::V1_0::EnCommonListenerID)>::Perform' requested here
explicit Impl(const linked_ptr<R>& value)
^
external/googletest/googlemock/include/gmock/gmock-actions.h:557:26: note: in instantiation of member function 'testing::internal::ReturnAction<iauto::hardware::ucom::common::V1_0::EnCommonFuncResult>::Impl<iauto::hardware::ucom::common::V1_0::EnCommonFuncResult, android::hardware::Return<iauto::hardware::ucom::common::V1_0::EnCommonFuncResult> (iauto::hardware::ucom::common::V1_0::EnCommonListenerID)>::Impl' requested here
return Action<F>(new Impl<R, F>(value_));
^

```

6 条回复

amiwrong123

2019-10-24 21:40:08 +08:00

```cpp
template<typename T> class Return : public details::return_status {
private:
T mVal {};
public:
Return(T v) : details::return_status(), mVal{v} {}
Return(Status s) : details::return_status(s) {}

// move-able.
// precondition: "this" has checked status
// postcondition: other is safe to destroy after moving to *this.
Return(Return &&other) = default;
Return &operator=(Return &&) = default;

~Return() = default;

operator T() const {
assertOk();
return mVal;
}

T withDefault(T t) {
return isOk() ? mVal : t;
}
};
```
这是 android::hardware::Return 的源码，因为有这句 Return(Return &&other) = default;，我就不能调用拷贝构造函数了，因为被隐式删除了。

求大佬解答了

amiwrong123

2019-10-24 22:19:20 +08:00

error: call to implicitly-deleted copy constructor of 'testing::internal::ReturnAction<iauto::hardware::ucom::common::V1_0::EnCommonFuncResult>::Impl<iauto::hardware::ucom::common::V1_0::EnCommonFuncResult, android::hardware::Return<iauto::hardware::ucom::common::V1_0::EnCommonFuncResult> (iauto::hardware::ucom::common::V1_0::EnCommonListenerID)>::Result' (aka 'android::hardware::Return<iauto::hardware::ucom::common::V1_0::EnCommonFuncResult>')
virtual Result Perform(const ArgumentTuple&) { return value_; }
^~~~~~
external/googletest/googlemock/include/gmock/gmock-actions.h:575:14: note: in instantiation of member function 'testing::internal::ReturnAction<iauto::hardware::ucom::common::V1_0::EnCommonFuncResult>::Impl<iauto::hardware::ucom::common::V1_0::EnCommonFuncResult, android::hardware::eturn<iauto::hardware::ucom::common::V1_0::EnCommonFuncResult> (iauto::hardware::ucom::common::V1_0::EnCommonListenerID)>::Perform' requested here
explicit Impl(const linked_ptr<R>& value)
^
external/googletest/googlemock/include/gmock/gmock-actions.h:557:26: note: in instantiation of member function 'testing::internal::ReturnAction<iauto::hardware::ucom::common::V1_0::EnCommonFuncResult>::Impl<iauto::hardware::ucom::common::V1_0::EnCommonFuncResult, android::hardware::Return<iauto::hardware::ucom::common::V1_0::EnCommonFuncResult> (iauto::hardware::ucom::common::V1_0::EnCommonListenerID)>::Impl' requested here
return Action<F>(new Impl<R, F>(value_));
^
TestSender.cpp:54:66: note: in instantiation of function template specialization 'testing::internal::ReturnAction<iauto::hardware::ucom::common::V1_0::EnCommonFuncResult>::operator Action<android::hardware::Return<iauto::hardware::ucom::common::V1_0::EnCommonFuncResult> (iauto::hardware::ucom::common::V1_0::EnCommonListenerID)>' requested here
EXPECT_CALL(mockICommon, unRegisterListener(_)).WillOnce(::testing::Return(EnCommonFuncResult::EN_COMMON_RESULT_OK));
^
system/libhidl/base/include/hidl/Status.h:200:5: note: copy constructor is implicitly deleted because 'Return<iauto::hardware::ucom::common::V1_0::EnCommonFuncResult>' has a user-declared move constructor
Return(Return &&other) = default;

给一下附言 1 的完整错误信息吧。

可能是因为 gmock 的::testing::Return 的内部逻辑吧，导致我这个地方总是会调用到 android::hardware::ReturnReturn<EnComdCommonFuncResult>。gmock 的源码我也去看了，但是太难懂了。快哭了

billyzs

2019-10-24 23:44:11 +08:00

试试
```
Return<EnCommonFuncResult> returnOk{EnCommonFuncResult::EN_COMMON_RESULT_OK}
```

xiaoloudoufu

2019-10-25 10:07:52 +08:00

你可以看一下文档:https://github.com/google/googletest/blob/master/googlemock/docs/cook_book.md ，对于 move-only 的类型应该要使用 ByMove()

amiwrong123

2019-10-25 10:55:58 +08:00 via Android

@xiaoloudoufu
谢谢，我也是刚看见有这个，等会我试试

amiwrong123

2019-10-25 12:13:01 +08:00

@xiaoloudoufu
果然，用了这个就好了，怪自己没好好文档了