UDP
$ dig fonts.gstatic.com @119.29.29.29 ; <<>> DiG 9.11.2 <<>> fonts.gstatic.com @119.29.29.29 ;; global options: +cmd ;; connection timed out; no servers could be reached
TCP
$ dig fonts.gstatic.com @119.29.29.29 +tcp ;; Connection to 119.29.29.29#53(119.29.29.29) for fonts.gstatic.com failed: connection refused.
httpdns 能正常解析
curl 119.29.29.29/d?dn=fonts.gstatic.com 203.208.39.255;203.208.39.247;203.208.39.239;203.208.39.255;203.208.39.248;203.208.39.247;203.208.39.239;203.208.39.248
另外 119.28.28.28 182.254.116.116 182.254.118.118
也是相同的结果
1.2.4.8 就可以正常解析 所以应该不是 ISP 的劫持?
$ dig fonts.gstatic.com @1.2.4.8 ; <<>> DiG 9.11.2 <<>> fonts.gstatic.com @1.2.4.8 ;; global options: +cmd ;; Got answer: ;; ->>HEADER<<- opcode: QUERY, status: NOERROR, id: 7572 ;; flags: qr rd ra; QUERY: 1, ANSWER: 9, AUTHORITY: 0, ADDITIONAL: 1 ;; OPT PSEUDOSECTION: ; EDNS: version: 0, flags:; udp: 4096 ;; QUESTION SECTION: ;fonts.gstatic.com. IN A ;; ANSWER SECTION: fonts.gstatic.com. 48 IN CNAME gstaticadssl.l.google.com. gstaticadssl.l.google.com. 2 IN A 203.208.48.88 gstaticadssl.l.google.com. 2 IN A 203.208.48.95 gstaticadssl.l.google.com. 2 IN A 203.208.48.79 gstaticadssl.l.google.com. 2 IN A 203.208.48.88 gstaticadssl.l.google.com. 122 IN A 203.208.48.87 gstaticadssl.l.google.com. 122 IN A 203.208.48.95 gstaticadssl.l.google.com. 122 IN A 203.208.48.79 gstaticadssl.l.google.com. 122 IN A 203.208.48.87 ;; Query time: 15 msec ;; SERVER: 1.2.4.8#53(1.2.4.8) ;; WHEN: Thu Dec 28 23:15:21 CST 2017 ;; MSG SIZE rcvd: 210
网络是联通 @johnjiang85 给看一下?
![]() | 1 iLiberty OP 额 没召唤成功... @johnjiang85 |
2 skylancer 2017-12-29 02:13:20 +08:00 DNSPod 天天 SRVFAIL 我都懒得用 |
![]() | 3 miaomiao888 2017-12-29 06:01:15 +08:00 很早就发现有这个问题 同样是 fonts.gstatic.com 这个域名 得 还是 114 |
![]() | 4 lhx2008 2017-12-29 07:09:37 +08:00 via Android ![]() dnspod 一直有奇怪的问题,无解 |
![]() | 5 laoyuan 2017-12-29 07:32:40 +08:00 不用为妙 |
![]() | 6 lniwn 2017-12-29 08:54:24 +08:00 via iPhone 遇到过好几次,解析不了 jianshu.com ,现在用阿里的了 |
![]() | 7 yexm0 2017-12-29 09:04:12 +08:00 via iPhone 联通用阿里那个 dns 经常会给我解析到电信的 ip 上,弃了 |
8 HalloCQ 2017-12-29 09:16:24 +08:00 +nocookie |
9 a86913179 2017-12-29 09:16:49 +08:00 首先,本身不支持 TCP,然后 UDP 不行,HTTP 正常,说明是运营商问题 |
10 HalloCQ 2017-12-29 09:17:59 +08:00 C:\Users\My>dig @119.29.29.29 jianshu.com +nocookie ; <<>> DiG 9.11.2 <<>> @119.29.29.29 jianshu.com +nocookie ; (1 server found) ;; global options: +cmd ;; Got answer: ;; ->>HEADER<<- opcode: QUERY, status: NOERROR, id: 63650 ;; flags: qr rd ra; QUERY: 1, ANSWER: 1, AUTHORITY: 0, ADDITIONAL: 1 ;; OPT PSEUDOSECTION: ; EDNS: version: 0, flags:; udp: 4096 ;; QUESTION SECTION: ;jianshu.com. IN A ;; ANSWER SECTION: jianshu.com. 600 IN A 106.75.17.181 ;; Query time: 185 msec ;; SERVER: 119.29.29.29#53(119.29.29.29) ;; WHEN: Fri Dec 29 09:16:47 ?D1ú±ê×?ê±?? 2017 ;; MSG SIZE rcvd: 56 C:\Users\My>dig @119.29.29.29 fonts.gstatic.com +nocookie ; <<>> DiG 9.11.2 <<>> @119.29.29.29 fonts.gstatic.com +nocookie ; (1 server found) ;; global options: +cmd ;; Got answer: ;; ->>HEADER<<- opcode: QUERY, status: NOERROR, id: 49536 ;; flags: qr rd ra; QUERY: 1, ANSWER: 5, AUTHORITY: 0, ADDITIONAL: 1 ;; OPT PSEUDOSECTION: ; EDNS: version: 0, flags:; udp: 4096 ;; QUESTION SECTION: ;fonts.gstatic.com. IN A ;; ANSWER SECTION: fonts.gstatic.com. 281 IN CNAME gstaticadssl.l.google.com. gstaticadssl.l.google.com. 161 IN A 203.208.39.215 gstaticadssl.l.google.com. 161 IN A 203.208.39.207 gstaticadssl.l.google.com. 161 IN A 203.208.39.223 gstaticadssl.l.google.com. 161 IN A 203.208.39.216 ;; Query time: 95 msec ;; SERVER: 119.29.29.29#53(119.29.29.29) ;; WHEN: Fri Dec 29 09:17:41 ?D1ú±ê×?ê±?? 2017 ;; MSG SIZE rcvd: 146 @lniwn @miaomiao888 |
![]() | 12 johnjiang85 2017-12-29 11:07:36 +08:00 @iLiberty bind9.11 之后的版本默认开启了 cookie,DNSPod 的公共 DNS 和权威 DNS 都还没有支持 cookie,需要显示指定+nocookie 或使用 9.10 版本,之前已经转给相关开发同事了,会慢慢灰度,权威已经少量灰度。 |
![]() | 13 johnjiang85 2017-12-29 11:11:32 +08:00 @skylancer @miaomiao888 @lhx2008 @laoyuan @lniwn 几个问题吧,1.今年 119.29.29.29 遇到的攻击特别多,就不说了,奇怪的是 114 竟然从最早到现在基本没遇到过攻击,个人可以先用 119.28.28.28 ,用户比较少,路由和 119.29.29.29 基本是一样的,节点完全一样。182.254.116.116,182.254.118.118 不推荐使用。 |
![]() | 14 johnjiang85 2017-12-29 11:13:20 +08:00 ![]() 再就是个别特殊域名在特定运营商可能有问题,这些大部分是递归到权威的线路和兼容性问题,后端节点太多,某些线路就可能被搞,或者权威对 ecs 的支持特别乱,自动判断是否支持 ecs 判断不出来,就得手工拉黑名单。都是需要人工验证操作的。具体就是需要提供域名、地区、运营商和截图了。 |
15 joejhy 2017-12-29 12:38:58 +08:00 我这边测试了一下是 OK 的,119.29.29.29 能够正常解析到域名 fonts.gstatic.com 。不过查了这个域名是 google 的,有些网络不能解析可能跟运营商的限制有关,毕竟 google 退出中国之后,有些域名还是受到限制的。请看下面: linux$ dig fonts.gstatic.com @119.29.29.29 ; <<>> DiG 9.10.3-P4-Ubuntu <<>> fonts.gstatic.com @119.29.29.29 ;; global options: +cmd ;; Got answer: ;; ->>HEADER<<- opcode: QUERY, status: NOERROR, id: 22116 ;; flags: qr rd ra; QUERY: 1, ANSWER: 5, AUTHORITY: 0, ADDITIONAL: 1 ;; OPT PSEUDOSECTION: ; EDNS: version: 0, flags:; udp: 4096 ;; QUESTION SECTION: ;fonts.gstatic.com. IN A ;; ANSWER SECTION: fonts.gstatic.com. 120 IN CNAME gstaticadssl.l.google.com. gstaticadssl.l.google.com. 18 IN A 203.208.51.87 gstaticadssl.l.google.com. 18 IN A 203.208.51.79 gstaticadssl.l.google.com. 18 IN A 203.208.51.88 gstaticadssl.l.google.com. 18 IN A 203.208.51.95 ;; Query time: 8 msec ;; SERVER: 119.29.29.29#53(119.29.29.29) ;; WHEN: Fri Dec 29 09:52:29 DST 2017 ;; MSG SIZE rcvd: 146 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- linux/$ dig fonts.gstatic.com @119.28.28.28 ; <<>> DiG 9.10.3-P4-Ubuntu <<>> fonts.gstatic.com @119.28.28.28 ;; global options: +cmd ;; Got answer: ;; ->>HEADER<<- opcode: QUERY, status: NOERROR, id: 49460 ;; flags: qr rd ra; QUERY: 1, ANSWER: 2, AUTHORITY: 0, ADDITIONAL: 1 ;; OPT PSEUDOSECTION: ; EDNS: version: 0, flags:; udp: 4096 ;; QUESTION SECTION: ;fonts.gstatic.com. IN A ;; ANSWER SECTION: fonts.gstatic.com. 123 IN CNAME gstaticadssl.l.google.com. gstaticadssl.l.google.com. 123 IN A 216.58.220.195 ;; Query time: 9 msec ;; SERVER: 119.28.28.28#53(119.28.28.28) ;; WHEN: Fri Dec 29 11:38:40 DST 2017 ;; MSG SIZE rcvd: 98 --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- linux:/$ dig fonts.gstatic.com @182.254.116.116 ; <<>> DiG 9.10.3-P4-Ubuntu <<>> fonts.gstatic.com @182.254.116.116 ;; global options: +cmd ;; Got answer: ;; ->>HEADER<<- opcode: QUERY, status: NOERROR, id: 41104 ;; flags: qr rd ra; QUERY: 1, ANSWER: 5, AUTHORITY: 0, ADDITIONAL: 1 ;; OPT PSEUDOSECTION: ; EDNS: version: 0, flags:; udp: 4096 ;; QUESTION SECTION: ;fonts.gstatic.com. IN A ;; ANSWER SECTION: fonts.gstatic.com. 104 IN CNAME gstaticadssl.l.google.com. gstaticadssl.l.google.com. 16 IN A 203.208.43.127 gstaticadssl.l.google.com. 16 IN A 203.208.43.111 gstaticadssl.l.google.com. 16 IN A 203.208.43.119 gstaticadssl.l.google.com. 16 IN A 203.208.43.120 ;; Query time: 10 msec ;; SERVER: 182.254.116.116#53(182.254.116.116) ;; WHEN: Fri Dec 29 11:50:35 DST 2017 ;; MSG SIZE rcvd: 146 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- linux@DESKTOP-F7RK6L5:/$ dig fonts.gstatic.com @182.254.118.118 ; <<>> DiG 9.10.3-P4-Ubuntu <<>> fonts.gstatic.com @182.254.118.118 ;; global options: +cmd ;; Got answer: ;; ->>HEADER<<- opcode: QUERY, status: NOERROR, id: 17342 ;; flags: qr rd ra; QUERY: 1, ANSWER: 9, AUTHORITY: 0, ADDITIONAL: 1 ;; OPT PSEUDOSECTION: ; EDNS: version: 0, flags:; udp: 4096 ;; QUESTION SECTION: ;fonts.gstatic.com. IN A ;; ANSWER SECTION: fonts.gstatic.com. 256 IN CNAME gstaticadssl.l.google.com. gstaticadssl.l.google.com. 256 IN A 203.208.43.79 gstaticadssl.l.google.com. 256 IN A 203.208.43.87 gstaticadssl.l.google.com. 256 IN A 203.208.43.95 gstaticadssl.l.google.com. 256 IN A 203.208.43.88 gstaticadssl.l.google.com. 136 IN A 203.208.43.79 gstaticadssl.l.google.com. 136 IN A 203.208.43.88 gstaticadssl.l.google.com. 136 IN A 203.208.43.87 gstaticadssl.l.google.com. 136 IN A 203.208.43.95 ;; Query time: 34 msec ;; SERVER: 182.254.118.118#53(182.254.118.118) ;; WHEN: Fri Dec 29 11:51:09 DST 2017 ;; MSG SIZE rcvd: 210 楼主可以看我的以上分析。 |
![]() | 16 laoyuan 2017-12-29 12:50:31 +08:00 @johnjiang85 v2 山东分舵的烟台老乡们喊你加入 |
![]() | 17 iLiberty OP @johnjiang85 +nocookie 的确能拿到解析结果 但是发现 119.28.28.28 分配到了四川节点 延迟有点高 119.29.29.29 182.254.116.116 182.254.118.118 都就近分配到了天津节点 |
![]() | 18 johnjiang85 2017-12-29 17:55:56 +08:00 @iLiberty 你的出口 IP 是多少,发来我们测试下 |
![]() | 19 iLiberty OP |
![]() | 20 johnjiang85 2017-12-30 13:54:19 +08:00 @iLiberty 河北联通到 119.28.28.28 的路由看上去确实有问题,先绕到四川又回了广东,应该是直接去天津的,我找网络的人问下。不过这个不应该影响解析结果的。在四川联通测试和携带河北联通的 ecs ip 都能解析到北京去,这个日本的 IP 不知道怎么出现 |
![]() | 21 iLiberty OP @johnjiang85 解析结果的确没问题,就是各地联通过去的路由都有问题,还请贵司节后调整一下。 |
![]() | 22 iLiberty OP @johnjiang85 二十多天过去了 119.28.28.28 联通线路还是跑去四川 |
![]() | 23 leobin 2018-02-13 17:24:38 +08:00 @johnjiang85 最近福建铁通也有问题,比如解析这个域名 newjump.bid ,别的 dns 都正确,只有 119.29.29.29 的是错误的 |
![]() | 24 johnjiang85 2018-02-27 11:16:41 +08:00 |
![]() | 25 leobin 2018-02-27 16:27:18 +08:00 @johnjiang85 我的问题已经么问题啦 |
![]() | 26 leavic 2020-09-14 14:44:09 +08:00 不是我想挖坟,这么多年了,119.29.29.29 还是不支持 dnscookie |