这是一个创建于 3862 天前的主题，其中的信息可能已经有所发展或是发生改变。
http://centminmod.com/siegebenchmarks/2013/020313/
本来想用nginx 替代 express的static，这是闹哪样~
Quite interesting to see how well node.js clustered static file server scaled almost 2x times better in terms of transactions per second compared to Nginx web server **(4,250 trans/s vs 2,118 trans/s)** - especially at the higher concurrency levels. Also check out average response times **(0.14s vs 0.23s)**, longest transaction time **(1.10s vs 13.95s)** and transaction availability numbers all in node.js's favour.
本来想用nginx 替代 express的static，这是闹哪样~
Quite interesting to see how well node.js clustered static file server scaled almost 2x times better in terms of transactions per second compared to Nginx web server **(4,250 trans/s vs 2,118 trans/s)** - especially at the higher concurrency levels. Also check out average response times **(0.14s vs 0.23s)**, longest transaction time **(1.10s vs 13.95s)** and transaction availability numbers all in node.js's favour.
 | 1 yuankui 2015 年 7 月 1 日 性能往往不是瓶颈... |
 | 2 ChiangDi 2015 年 7 月 1 日 via Android 有问题吧，它这个 benchmark 不是用 express 的 static 吧 |
 | 4 newghost 2015 年 7 月 1 日 没有测试代码…… 感觉像是node.js里面做了缓存 |
Select Language