这是一个创建于 459 天前的主题，其中的信息可能已经有所发展或是发生改变。
由于用英语表达更容易理解，所以就用英语写吧：
Q: Why everything tastes like chicken?
A: Because "everythingtastes like chicken" tastes like chicken.
Proof:
"Everything tastes like chicken" is a set. S = {x | x tasteslikechicken}
This particular set ("everything tastes like chicken") contains itself because the set itself is an element of "everything".
Since "everything tastes like chicken" (as described), "everything", including this set, has to taste like chicken.
Hence, "everything tastes like chicken."
Q.E.D.
Q: Why everything tastes like chicken?
A: Because "everythingtastes like chicken" tastes like chicken.
Proof:
"Everything tastes like chicken" is a set. S = {x | x tasteslikechicken}
This particular set ("everything tastes like chicken") contains itself because the set itself is an element of "everything".
Since "everything tastes like chicken" (as described), "everything", including this set, has to taste like chicken.
Hence, "everything tastes like chicken."
Q.E.D.
第 1 条附言 2024-09-16 07:42:00 +08:00
Disclaimer: THIS IS A JOKE.
In mathematics, set "S = {x | x tastes like chicken}" obviously doesn't contain itself.
In mathematics, set "S = {x | x tastes like chicken}" obviously doesn't contain itself.
 | 1 re2ikotr 2024-09-15 20:29:36 +08:00 Why does the set contain itself? The set itself is an element of "everything", but it doesn't satisfy "tastes like chicken". |
 | 2 testcaoy7 OP @re2ikotr This is a joke. The fun lies in the play of words... |
 | 3 ftfunjth 2024-09-15 20:46:20 +08:00 via iPhone Bc we can using your proof to prove that “everything tastes like beef”. And beef doesn’t taste like chicken. s there’s a paradox. Your proof doesn’t make sense. |
 | 4 sagaxu 2024-09-15 20:57:02 +08:00  2 女人：“我说的都是对的” 男人：“何以见得？” 女人：“[我说的都是对的]这句话也是我说的，证毕” |
Select Language